UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1502

KEVIN POTTER; MARGUERITE C. POTTER; HARRY H.

POTTER; THEODORE POTTER; DALE M. POTTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

JAMES MOSTELLER, III; JAMES NANCE; STANLEY MCGUFFIN; HENDERSON AND SALLEY; BEDINGFIELD & WILLIAMS; NANCE & MCCANTS; AUGUSTA FIBERGLASS COATINGS, INC.; CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB, INCORPO- RATED; CRESTWOOD PARTNERSHIP; JOHN BOYD; DALE BRYANT; GEORGE SPRUCE MCCAIN; CLAUDE MCCAIN; MCCAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; RYAN TIDWELL; CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB TRUST, INCORPO- RATED; SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK; WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, N.A.; SINKLER & BOYD, P.A.; EDWARD HAYES; WALTER BRYANT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-1158-5-22)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, Harry H. Potter, Theodore Potter, Dale M. Potter, Appellants Pro Se. James Donovan Mosteller, III, BEDINGFIELD LAW OFFICES, Barnwell, South Carolina; James Drayton Nance, NANCE & MCCANTS, Aiken, South Carolina; Clarke Wardlaw DuBose, SINKLER & BOYD, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Edward A. Frazier, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion and granting sanctions against them.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Potter v. Mosteller, No. CA-98-1158-5- (D.S.C. Mar. 22 & 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED