Harrell v. Anthony

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Harrell v. Anthony

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7221

EDDIE HARRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CALVIN ANTHONY, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-510-9-13)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eddie Harrell appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Respondents and denying relief on his

petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion ac-

cepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Harrell v. Anthony, No. CA-00-510-9-13 (D.S.C. July 27,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished