Walker v. NC Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Walker v. NC Attorney General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6880

WILLIAM LEE WALKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MACK JARVIS; CLIFF JOHNSON, Secretary of North Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-803-1)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Appleton Reeves, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William Lee Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West

1994 & Supp. 2000).* We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See Walker v. North Carolina Attor-

ney General, No. CA-99-803-1 (M.D.N.C. June 14, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(c) (1994).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished