U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Jones v. Lee

Jones v. Lee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 8, 2000

Jones v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6771

GREGORY JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RANDALL LEE; ERNEST SUTTON, Defendants - Appellees, and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-162-5-BR)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Oscar Massey, II, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Gregory Jones appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Lee, No. CA-99-162-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.