UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6453

ALEXANDER CAMERON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS D. BAGWELL, Assistant Attorney General; ALFRED D. SWERSKY, Judge, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria; JOHN KLOCH, Prose- cutor, Circuit Court for the City of Alex- andria; BECKY J. MOORE, Esquire, of Land Clark, Carroll, Mendelson; JAMES C. CLARK, Esquire, Land Clark, Carroll, Mendelson; DEANNE DABS, Forensic Scientist, The Virginia Bureau of Forensic Science; MYRON SCHOMBERG, Forensic Scientist, The Virginia Bureau of Forensic Science; ANN MELCHIOR, Officer, City of Alexandria Police; BLAINE COLE, Officer, City of Alexandria Department of Police; JAMES H. AMMON, IV, Officer, City of Alexandria Department of Police; MARGARET HOOVER, Offi- cer, City of Alexandria Department of Police; DONALD B. CHAPMAN, Doctor, Alexandria Hospital; BONITO STANLEY, Nurse, Alexandria Hospital; VALERIE TRAVERS, Carydale East Apartment; CHRISTIAN C. WESTERMAN; JAMES C. CACHERIS, Senior District Judge, United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia; H. EMORY WIDENER, JR., Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; JOHN D. BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Panel of Justices Whom Dismissed (Record No. 980227); FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, Justices whom were in position to grant rehearing en banc and refused to do so,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-00-201-AM)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Cameron, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Alexander Cameron, a state inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging violations

of

(West Supp. 2000), and

,

1986 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion dismissing Cameron’s complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A

(West Supp. 2000) and find that this appeal is frivolous. Ac-

cordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Cameron v. Bagwell, No. CA-00-201-AM (E.D. Va. filed

Mar. 15, 2000; entered Mar. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3