U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Taylor v. K Mart Corporation

Taylor v. K Mart Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 7, 2000

Taylor v. K Mart Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1663

CARRIE C. TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

K MART CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-216-5-BR3)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carrie C. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Phillip McGuire, HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; Linda Morris Fox, HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Carrie C. Taylor appeals the district court’s order granting K Mart’s motion for summary judgment on her employment discrim- ination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. K Mart Corp., No. CA-99-216-5-BR3 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2000). K Mart’s motion to strike is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.