Alexander v. Patapsco Park Comm

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Alexander v. Patapsco Park Comm

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1942

MARY M. ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATAPSCO PARK COMMUNITY; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM; PHIL MARNER; CHUCK BOWIE, Representatives,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA- 3343-MJG)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary M. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mary M. Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying

her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Alexander v. Patapsco Park Cmty., No. CA-3343-MJG (D. Md. June 22,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished