U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Ifediora v. Wackenhut Security

Ifediora v. Wackenhut Security
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 6, 2000

Ifediora v. Wackenhut Security

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2117

EMAR IFEDIORA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WACKENHUT SECURITY; IBM CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees, and

MIKE FISHER; JOE VALENCIA, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-217-5-H)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emar Ifediora, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Marshall Wood, Jr., MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina; Michael Terry Medford, MANNING, FULTON & SKINNER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Emar Ifediora appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ifediora v. Wackenhut Sec., No. CA-99-217-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.