Helms v. Rumer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Helms v. Rumer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7005

JERRY ADAM HELMS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DANNY RUMER, Warden; PAUL R. SANDERS, Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 99-2300-PJM)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Adam Helms, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Adam Helms, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Helms v. Rumer, No. CA-99-2300-PJM (D.

Md. June 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished