U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Brooks-Bey v. Kupec

Brooks-Bey v. Kupec
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 6, 2000

Brooks-Bey v. Kupec

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7417

TROY LYNN BROOKS-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 00-2812-CCB)

Submitted: November 20, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Lynn Brooks-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Troy Lynn Brooks-Bey appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Brooks-Bey v. Kupec, No. CA-00-2812-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.