U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Dillard v. Bumgarner

Dillard v. Bumgarner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 4, 2000

Dillard v. Bumgarner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7328

THOMAS T. DILLARD, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL BUMGARNER, Correctional Administrator I (NCI); MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-270-1-1-MU)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: December 4, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas T. Dillard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael F. Easley, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Thomas T. Dillard, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We grant Dillard’s motion to amend his informal brief and consider the issues raised therein. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Dillard v. Bumgarner, No. CA-99-270-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2000). In addition, we deny petitioner’s motion for ap- pointment of counsel. We also deny Dillard’s request for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.