Clark v. Underwood

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Clark v. Underwood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1580

MAZEO CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CECIL H. UNDERWOOD, Governor, State of West Virginia; PHIL GOODWIN, Ex Director, Memorial Hospital, Kanawha City; GAYLENE MILLER, Com- missioner, Ex Director Earl Jarvis, K.V.S.S. Citizen, K.V.S.S. Board of Directors of this non profit organization incorporated by the State of West Virginia (sic); CHARLESTON HOUSING AUTHORITY; CITY OF CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA; HUSSIEN E. EL-AHA, Dr.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-892-2)

Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: December 4, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mazeo Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mazeo Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Clark v. Underwood, No. CA-99-892-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 25, 2000).*

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on April 24, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 25, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished