U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Leslie

United States v. Leslie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 13, 2000

United States v. Leslie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

NEVILLE SYLVESTER LESLIE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-152, CA-99-1029-AM)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 13, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pleasant Sanford Brodnax, III, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alex- andria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Neville Sylvester Leslie seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Leslie, Nos. CR-98-152; CA-99-1029-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.