United States v. Crum

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Crum

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7143

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH CRUM, a/k/a Unique,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94- 384-L, CA-97-2108-L)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 12, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Crum, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, As- sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Joseph Crum seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Crum, Nos. CR-94-384-L; CA-97-2108-L

(D. Md. Aug. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished