U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Crum

United States v. Crum
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2000

United States v. Crum

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7143

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JOSEPH CRUM, a/k/a Unique, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94- 384-L, CA-97-2108-L)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 12, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Crum, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, As- sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Joseph Crum seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crum, Nos. CR-94-384-L; CA-97-2108-L (D. Md. Aug. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.