U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Baptiste

United States v. Baptiste
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 11, 2000

United States v. Baptiste

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ANTOINE BAPTISTE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-97-114, CA-99-498-1)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoine Baptiste, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Antoine Baptiste seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Baptiste, Nos. CR-97-114; CA-99-498-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 10 & Sept. 14, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.