Cordero v. Slater

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Cordero v. Slater

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2100

ANGEL F. CORDERO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RODNEY E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-3019-2-18AJ, CA-99-2580-2-18AJ)

Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angel F. Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Angel F. Cordero appeals the district court’s orders and judg-

ment granting summary judgment to the Secretary of Transportation

and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cordero v.

Slater, Nos. CA-99-3019-2-18AJ; CA-99-2580-2-18AJ (D.S.C. July 28

& Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished