Cordero v. Slater
Cordero v. Slater
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2100
ANGEL F. CORDERO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RODNEY E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-3019-2-18AJ, CA-99-2580-2-18AJ)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angel F. Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Angel F. Cordero appeals the district court’s orders and judg-
ment granting summary judgment to the Secretary of Transportation
and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cordero v.
Slater, Nos. CA-99-3019-2-18AJ; CA-99-2580-2-18AJ (D.S.C. July 28
& Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished