U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Lampkin

United States v. Lampkin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 20, 2000

United States v. Lampkin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7025

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JOSEPH LAMPKIN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-98-84, CA-00-813-AM)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 20, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Lampkin, Appellant Pro Se. Francine Davis, David Jay Ignall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Joseph Lampkin seeks to appeal the district court’s order de- nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Lampkin, Nos. CR-98-84; CA-00-813-AM (E.D. Va. May 26, 2000). In addition, we decline to address the issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.