McIntyre-Handy v. West Telemarketing
McIntyre-Handy v. West Telemarketing
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1845
SONYA MCINTYRE-HANDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-99-100-4)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sonya McIntyre-Handy, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia; Phyllis Pollard, SCOTT, DOUGLASS & MCCONNICO, L.L.P., Austin, Texas, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Sonya McIntyre-Handy appeals the district court’s order grant-
ing summary judgment to the employer in Appellant’s religious dis-
crimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McIntyre-Handy
v. West Telemarketing, No. CA-99-100-4 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished