Jackson v. Fowlkes
Jackson v. Fowlkes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7504
MIKE E. JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
K. FOWLKES, Grievance Coordinator for SX1; D. E. WILMOUTH, Unit Manager for SX1; LIEUTENANT HARGRAVES, for SX1; LIEUTENANT BROWN, for SX1; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MAYO, for SX1; SERGEANT EZZELL, for SX1; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HILL, for SX1; H. CLARK, Operation Office, SX1,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-00-377-2)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 28, 2000
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike E. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Mike E. Jackson, a Virginia state inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp.
2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Jackson v. Fowlkes,
No. CA-00-377-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2000). We deny Jackson’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished