Bostron v. Apfel
Bostron v. Apfel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2238
MICHAEL H. BOSTRON, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
MAURICE R. DUBOIS; JOHN E. BOYER, Plaintiffs, versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3154-H)
Submitted: November 22, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael H. Bostron, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Michael H. Bostron appeals the district court’s order granting judgment as a matter of law to the Commissioner in Bostron’s civil action in which he alleged employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bostron v. Apfel, No. CA-97-3154-H (D. Md. July 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.