In re: Montgomery v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In re: Montgomery v., 1 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2001)

In re: Montgomery v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Wayne Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for relief from a properly imposed prefil-ing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re: Montgomery, No. MISC-95-136-6 (D.S.C. July 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
In Re Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, A/K/A Shaka MacUmba Zulu Z, Plaintiff-Appellant
Status
Unpublished