Scardo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Opinion
Douglas Scardo appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) on his claim that Met-Life unreasonably terminated his long-term disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scardo v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., No. CA-99-146-1 (W-D.Ya. Apr. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Douglas SCARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished