U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Echols v. Caldera

Echols v. Caldera
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2001 · Michael, Per Curiam, Traxler, Wilkins
3 F. App'x 22

Echols v. Caldera

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deloyise Echols appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Echols v. Caldera, No. CA-00-247-A (E.D.Va. Apr. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.