Randall J. Keystone seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000), and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Keystone’s motion to reconsider, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denying a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Keystone v. Saunders, No. CA-00-342-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 29, 2000; Oct. 12, 2000). We deny Keystone’s motions for appointment of counsel and habeas corpus ad testificandum. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.