Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodson, Nos. CR-94-79; CA-99-218-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.