Patrick Edwin Rudd appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rudd v. United States, No. CA-00-618-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 20 & Oct. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con *132 tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.