Clarence A. Lindsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, regarding Lindsey’s appeal of his § 3582(c)(2) motion, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court; regarding the appeal of Lindsey’s § 2255 motion, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lindsey, No. CR-91-116-N (E.D.Va. May 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *117 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.