Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co., 3 F. App'x 102 (4th Cir. 2001)

Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric C. Hansen seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order *103 affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of benefits pursuant to the Long-shore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Hansen also appeals the Board’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decisions are based upon substantial evidence and are without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co., Inc., No. BRB-98-1596 (Sept. 7, 1999 & Feb. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eric C. HANSEN, Petitioner, v. CALDWELL DIVING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; Employer’s Insurance of Wausau; United States Department of Labor, Division of Longshore Harbors Workers; Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
Status
Unpublished