United States v. Beasley
United States v. Beasley
Opinion
Rehearing granted, rehearing en banc denied, and case placed in abeyance by order filed 2/20/01 UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6719
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID EARL BEASLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-122-F, CA-98-810-5-F)
Submitted: October 17, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Earl Beasley, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
David Earl Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Beasley, Nos. CR-94-122-F; CA-98-810-
5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished