McCoy v. Bruder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
McCoy v. Bruder, 5 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2001)

McCoy v. Bruder

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Bruder, No. CA-99-3026-L (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2000). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Frankie L. McCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BRUDER, Lieutenant; David C. Dozier, O.I.C., Co. II; Unknown Named Defendants, Individual and Official Capacity; Thomas McPherson, Nurse; Charles Hampsey; Gary Smith, Lieutentant (RCI); Dorine White (MHC); Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished