Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion *160 and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Eury v. Keelin, No. CA-00-415-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.