Rogers v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 28, 2001

Rogers v. Angelone, 5 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Dewayne Rogers seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Rogers v. Angelone, No. CA-00-5-2 (E.D.Va. July 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(Z) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).

Reference

Full Case Name: Ricky Dewayne ROGERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Status: Unpublished