U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Harden v. Eagleton

Harden v. Eagleton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2001 · Widener, Williams, Hamilton
5 F. App'x 124

Harden v. Eagleton

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William G. Harden appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. Because Harden does not challenge the district court’s disposition and because his request for enforcement was not presented to the district court, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the district court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.