Scott v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Timothy Scott appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district *211 court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. United Parcel Servs., Inc., No. CA-99-631-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 3, Sept. 26, & Nov. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Timothy SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED; Teamsters Local No. 391, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished