Johnson v. Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Henderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2395

ROLAND D. JOHNSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General,

Defendant - Appellee, and

MICHAEL HILL, Manager, Largo II, VMF; DAVID COOK, Manager, Largo II VMF; VIVIAN HAMPTON, EEO Investigator; ROSE CARTER, EEO Specialist; WELDON CARSON, Postmaster, Capitol Heights Branch; ROGER RUCKER, Supervisor, Capitol Heights Branch,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00- 2747-AMD)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 27, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roland D. Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tawana Elaine Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Roland D. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination action. Our review of the

record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Johnson v. Henderson, No. CA-00-2747-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 26,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished