Johnson v. Henderson
Johnson v. Henderson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2395
ROLAND D. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, Defendant - Appellee, and
MICHAEL HILL, Manager, Largo II, VMF; DAVID COOK, Manager, Largo II VMF; VIVIAN HAMPTON, EEO Investigator; ROSE CARTER, EEO Specialist; WELDON CARSON, Postmaster, Capitol Heights Branch; ROGER RUCKER, Supervisor, Capitol Heights Branch, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00- 2747-AMD)
Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 27, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roland D. Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tawana Elaine Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Roland D. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Henderson, No. CA-00-2747-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.