Jessie Foggie appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e). Our review of the record *209 discloses that this appeal is without merit. Foggie’s motion for reconsideration does not demonstrate that her underlying action was improperly dismissed. We therefore find that the district court’s denial of her Rule 59(e) motion was not an abuse of discretion, * and affirm the district court’s order on the reasoning of the district court. Foggie v. Sears Roebuck & Co., No. CA-00-496-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.