Costley v. Kupec
Opinion
Nathaniel M. Costley seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Costley v. Kupec, No. CA-00-1643-DKC (D.Md. Sept. 26 & Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Nathaniel M. COSTLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert KUPEC, Warden; Commissioner of Corrections; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished