William Ray Miller, II, appeals the district court’s orders granting Utica’s motion for summary judgment on his third party complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co., No. CA-97-3194-MJG (D.Md. Sept. 22 & Nov. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.