Grant v. O'Kelly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Grant v. O'Kelly, 6 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2001)

Grant v. O'Kelly

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Grant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Grant v. O’Kelly, No. CA-99-2755-3-24-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
William Morris GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam D. O’KELLY; William D. Catoe, Director of SCDC; Susan Litz, Accountant; Ivyl S. Hudson; Benjamin Montgomery; J. Munsford Scott; Ricky Harris; Jane Doe; Robert E. Ward; Kenny Green, Lieutenant; J. Rollings; Derwin Neasman; Officer Miller; Officer McDougal; Officer Robinson; Officer Sprattling, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished