Arthur Wiggins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wiggins’ motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wiggins v. Hutchinson, No. CA-99-716-AW (D.Md. Nov. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *324 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.