U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Redfern

United States v. Redfern
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2001

United States v. Redfern

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

HENRY ANDRE REDFERN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-567, CA-00-1335-17-0)

Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 29, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Andre Redfern, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Henry Andre Redfern seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Redfern, Nos. CR-98-567; CA- 00-1335-17-0 (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.