In re: Suggs v.
In re: Suggs v.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6261
In Re: DENNIS RAY SUGGS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-231-5)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 19, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Ray Suggs, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Dennis Ray Suggs petitions this court for a writ of mandamus.
He asks this court to direct the district court to rule on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) petition, alleging that the district court has delayed unreasonably. Writs of mandamus are extraordinary writs, and the power to issue is sparingly exercised.
See Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct., 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976).
Suggs’ petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that the district court has taken no action for over eight months. Accordingly, we deny Suggs’ petition without preju- dice to his refiling it if the district court fails to act within a reasonable time. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.