United States v. Sindram
United States v. Sindram
12 F. App'x 126
United States v. Sindram
Opinion
Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his motion for a hearing and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.