Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Williams v. Nestrick (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- VanHorn v. Nebraska State Racing Commission (United States District Court, Nebraska 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Soraya F. Fares and Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their challenges to ongoing immigration proceedings and their claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fares v. INS, No. CA-96-540-3-P (W.D.N.C. filed Oct. 27, 1998, entered Oct. 28, 1998; filed Oct. 8, 1999, entered Oct. 12, 1999; filed Jan. 10, 2000, entered Jan. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.