Bertrand Leon Curtis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). Assuming Curtis’ claim is not procedurally defaulted, a matter not addressed by the district court and one we *130 do not decide, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Curtis, No. CA-01-127-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.