U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Allnutt v. Handler

Allnutt v. Handler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2001 · Luttig, Motz, Hamilton
8 F. App'x 225

Counsel

Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., pro se., Anthony Thomas Sheehan, Melissa Anemojanis Holton, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC; Tamera Lynn Fine, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

Allnutt v. Handler

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision. The 5 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his actions filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 1996 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allnutt v. Handler, Nos. CA-98-901-Y; CA-98-1722-Y (D.Md. May 24, 2000 and Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.