Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find the action frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Armstrong v. Watson, No. CA-97-1335-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Dec. 13, 2000; entered Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.