U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Armstrong v. Taylor

Armstrong v. Taylor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 8, 2001

Armstrong v. Taylor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2559

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

B. R. TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 00-2560

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

B. R. TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (MISC-00-39-5, MISC-00-40-5)

Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: May 8, 2001 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders denying leave to file complaints against Police Officer B.R. Taylor. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.